Hi,
This isn't going to be a news item; I just thought it would be grand if I mocked someone who, by sheer coincidence, wasn't me.
Indulge me: Go here.
At the bottom of this smorgasbord of reviewed items you will notice a review for a movie called Air Bud - World Pup. The premise of the movie, while ingeniously avoiding trite and clichéd clichés such as, say, the ‘duality of man', revolves around a dog that can, and does, play football (our soccer) for a co-ed amateur football team. Weighty material indeed.
My main concern with *•´¯`•.¸.•Eddy•.¸.•´¯`•*'s (I'm not sure how one would pronounce his name) review is his comment that the movie was “totally unrealistic”. Again, if I could just to take a second to remind you that the plot of the movie revolves around a dog playing football for a co-ed amateur football team. This, naturally, begs the question: just how much realism was he expecting from such a movie? Moreover, is it possible that he found that long sought after realism in the first two Air Bud movies (which he claims to have liked)?
Anywhat: I propose that we find Mr. *•´¯`•.¸.•Eddy•.¸.•´¯`•* and infect his eyes with every STD known to man and that, subsequently, we put him in a position where he will be repeatedly raped by several large and brutish ostriches.
While I'm not sure how we would accomplish that ostrich bit I am sure that *•´¯`•.¸.•Eddy•.¸.•´¯`•* should do some sort of penance for his complete and utter abject stupidity.
Thank you.
Written on Wednesday, 22 January 2003